e - Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly Spreading the light of humanity & freedom ________________________________________________________________
Editor : Nagaraj.M.R............vol.3…issue.01.............17/03/2007 ________________________________________________________________
Editorial : BRUTAL MASSACRE BY POLICE ON FARMERS – S.E.Z NANDIGRAM
WHY MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES ARE INVESTING IN
HRW condemns the brutal massacre by police on farmers – who are going to loss all their lands , sources.of livelihood for the sake of special economic zone at nandigram , west
In every mega projects undertaken by government , both the state government & central government have functioned like REAL ESTATE / COMMISSION AGENTS for the rich & mighty . the government says it is acquiring lands for development of industries , for public good. In reality there is only good of rich & mighty.
For forming S.E.Zs , corporates gets speedy single window approvals from government , lands at concessional rates – lower than market value , soft loans from Indian banks , tax exemptions for years from the government , dedicated power supply , etc , from the government . these corporates are even given free hand to raise share capital in the Indian market. the government has enacted flexible labour laws specifically for S.E.Zs , they can hire & fire without bothering to pay gratuity , etc and they are exempted from providing P.F / E.S.I coverage to their employees ie they need not worry about the occupational health hazards of their employees , they can employ them till they are fit & throw them on streets afterwards. These corporates take our own money, employ our own people , use our own natural resources & finally take away the net profits to their home countries – what they give back ? – environmental pollution , tax evasions , low paid occupational hazardous jobs to locals , stock market scams .
During Previous License Regime foreign, investment was not directly welcome in
They are not bringing in new production technologies in the areas like space research, nuclear energy, bio-technology, pharmaceuticals or pollution control, to
1. There is lack of comprehensive environmental norms.
2. The enforcement of environmental norms is lax.
3. The cost of health coverage, social security net to be provided to the workers exposed to the occupational hazards is less.
4. The cost of compensation to be paid to the persons-who died or suffered damages due to occupational hazards/environmental pollution is meager.
5. The enforcement of labour laws are lax.
6. Public money can be easily raised through lending Banks, primary market within
7. The tax can be evaded through various loopholes like transferring money to holding companies situated at
8. The tax can be evaded, company money can be cheated by lending money to sister / holding concerns at low interest rates or by selling shares, materials to their private companies at low rates or by buying shares, materials from their holding/sister concerns at exhorbitant rates, etc.
9. The corporate governance laws are almost absent in
10. Above all, the time can be bought by very slow Indian legal system, if any dispute arise.
11. On top of it, well trained, technically qualified people are available at low rates through contractors.
Just consider the following cases which highlight the apathy, irresponsibility of government of
2. The people living near the mines of R.E.M.P. in Kerala are suffering due to exposure to the radio active materials, Same is the case with the people of Jadaguda, Jharkhand, living near the U.C.I.L. plant. Both M/S R.E.M.P & M/s U.C.I.L are department of atomic energy enterprises.
3. Few years back, In Mysore railway station containers of radio- active materials were left unattended. The dome of reactor building at construction stage collapsed in nuclear power plant at Kaiga. A fire tragedy occurred in Kakrapar nuclear power plant. In the recent Tsunami waves onslaught, certain important facilities of Koodakulam atomic plant were damaged near Chennai.
4. In 1984,
5. In the above union carbide disaster, the Government of India didn't present the case properly before supreme courts of
7. The medicines like nimesulide, paracetamol, etc. with hazardous side effects which are banned in U.S.A.& Europe, are easily marketed by the same U.S.& Europe based MNCs in India.
Most of the times, in government projects itself the displaced persons are cheated by the government in numerous ways.
14. When specific cases of human rights violations were brought before the government & Judiciary by HRW, both of them didn't respond at all.
All the above cases highlight the fact that, government of India & Indian judiciary treats it's citizens lives as cheap, dispensable at will. This is the major attracting force for MNCs to
2. In 1985, Government of India enacted "
3. The paradox of this "
4. In 1989, when an appeal about interim compensation to be paid by the U.C.I.L to all the victims was being heard in the apex court, the supreme court of India without giving a chance to the victims to make their point, without consulting them, without making a proper assessment of damages/losses, gave an arbitrary figure as verdict & dropped all civil, criminal proceedings against U.C.C.&U.C.I.L
5. In the same year 1989, the Government of India without consulting the victims of disaster, without making proper assessment of damages/ losses, negotiated a settlement with the U.C.C. and in turn gave full legal immunity to U.C.C.& U.C.I.L from civil & Criminal proceedings
6. Even the Government of India didn't present the case of victim's-gas tragedy victims, properly before the U.S.courts, where the U.C.C is based. All these premeditated acts only benefited the criminals- U.C.C&UCIL. Are not the supreme court of India & Government of
In the same way, the U.C.I.L has caused massive damages to Indians & refusing to pay commensurate to damages. Dow chemicals which took- over U.C.C. is also refusing to pay. DOW chemicals which is the new owner of U.C.C. naturally inherits both profits, credits lent & liabilities to pay of U.C.C. Still it is refusing to pay. Now it is the turn of Government of U.S.A. to cough-up the sum.
Nowadays, it has become routine for central & State ministers to go- on foreign jaunts, to globe -trott inviting F.D.I/ M.N.Cs to
CORPORATE CRIMINALS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ILLS IN
The recent raids by C.B.I & KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA have proved how the tax officials have become multi-millionaires. The sad part is that some of the police officials who are on deputation to C.B.I & LOKAYUKTHA themselves are utterly corrupt.
This scourge can only be cured by corporate accountability intoto. However , all the industrialists , traders who are demanding for more flexible labour reforms , economic reforms , infrastructure , etc are not at all concerned about their own accountability with respect to tax , environment , other laws. The MNCs coming to
Bottomline : development is a must , it must be all around . but not at the cost of majority to make a few richer.
INDIA: Nandigram, the latest outcome of a failing justice system
The central and state governments of India ruling 1.2 billion people in the world's largest democracy boasts of economic and industrial growth, surpassing almost all nations except China. Ideally, this growth should trickle down to every citizen of the country both rich and poor, so all could reap the benefits.
However, it is the deeper understanding of these two catchwords 'rich' and 'poor' as understood in India that gives an insight into the contradiction between what India actually is and what its government wishes to be projected outside. That is,
Unity in diversity is the catchphrase often used in reference to
In Nandigram, what was reflected, unfortunately at the expense of the lives of 41 persons (and probably many more), is how ordinary people could be exploited to cater to the interests of political parties. It is also a sad reflection of the state administration's failure to understand the situation and react sensibly to its people's most pressing problems.
The killing of 54 persons, including 15 personnel of the Chhattisgarh Armed Forces, in an attack allegedly by 300 to 350 CPI (Maoist) cadres and carried out on a police base camp in the Bastar region in the early hours of March 15 is an example of how a failed state can be a fertile ground for armed insurgency. The growth in the strength and number of the Maoist cadres in that state is not a sporadic event. Years of neglect, from much before the formation of the state, caste based discrimination, rampant poverty, killings, rape and torture perpetrated on the ordinary people by state sponsored agents served prolific ground for Maoists to spread their wings.
Thirty-nine of the dead in Chhattisgarh are members of Salva Judum, a private armed group formed by the state, consisting mainly of tribal youth, to help the police contain the Maoist insurgency in that state. Chhattisgarh is not the only state facing this problem. Many states are witnessing a growing number of Maoist sponsored attacks and killings. Massive numbers are also injured including both state officials and ordinary civilians. Such incidents indicate that something is drastically going wrong or already gone terribly wrong in India. These homicides, in large numbers, manifest symptoms of something horrid. A cancerous growth of callousness towards rule of law and justice.
Unfortunately the judiciary, formerly known for its activism, responds way too late. For example the West Bengal High Court has ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to immediately inquire into the circumstances leading to police firing and submit a report. It has also ordered the state government to submit a separate report. But how can the courts of India be expected to prevent and find solutions to such problems? Indeed the courts have a definite role to play but it is beset with its own problems. Bitter experiences like the delay in courts have taken away the ordinary person's confidence in the judicial systems in the country.
Had people not lost confidence in their court system, they probably would have approached the courts when faced with serious issues rather than allowing the political parties to exploit them.
The recent eviction of residents from Belilious Park, Bagbazar and Cossipore in West Bengal was sanctioned by the same Court which has now ordered the CBI investigation into the killing in Nandigram. In the former cases the Court did not show much concern regarding the 'unconstitutionality' of the evictions – notwithstanding that similar force was used. The difference probably was because the eviction was of 'untouchables' staying within the city limits.
Persons like Lakhichand Paswan, father of Bhikari Paswan had to wait for more than ten years to find out whether the police officers allegedly responsible for murdering his son would face a prosecution, thanks to the time taken by the High Court of West Bengal to decide whether official sanction was required to prosecute a police officer for an alleged charge of murder. By the time the prosecution was allowed, Lakhichand was dead. The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is certain that this is not an isolated case, but a common phenomenon in India. The Supreme Court of India is also not immune to this evil.
The Narmada Dam issue decided by the Supreme Court is a down fall from the jurisprudence the Court has set while deciding the Bombay Municipal Corporation Case. The Court, in this judgment justified the use of force for eviction. The result of such delays and attitudes is blatant impunity. A law enforcement agency that enjoys impunity is one that will go to any extent to be exploited and to exploit.
The Supreme Court of India has of course stepped out of the box in several occasions. Recently the Court has observed that those responsible for corruption must be hanged publicly. The remark was made while hearing the bail applications of the accused in the fodder scams reported from Bihar state -- yet another state suffering from Maoist upsurge. The judgments in the D. K. Basu case, the Prakash Singh case and the Best Bakery case are a few other examples.
Since the judgment in D. K. Basu 11 years ago, it would be interesting to see whether there has been even a single case where the Court has initiated contempt of court proceedings against any policemen for flouting its directives. The AHRC had brought to the Court's notice at least a dozen cases where the guidelines issued by the Court in the D. K. Basu case were violated.
Also, regarding the Prakash Singh case had the state governments complied with the directions of the Court? Will there be any compliance within the next two decade?
But the same Court, while deciding the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958, upheld the validity of the law allowing the killings to continue in the North-Eastern state of Manipur. The Court lacked the minimum commonsense to appreciate that peace cannot be attained through the firing of guns.
Compared to what is going on in Manipur, Nandigram is the tip of the iceberg. The government of India is so scared that it will not allow journalists from foreign media to visit Manipur. What is the government afraid of? If a young man decided to take revenge from an army officer who killed his parents and raped his sisters, who is to be blamed? The person or the system that allowed the murder and rape to happen and yet permitted the officer to continue in service?
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India is yet another institution that is responsible for addressing human rights abuses in India. With the experience of filing more than 70 cases before the Commission within the past one year, the AHRC could say that when it comes to investigating cases of human rights violations the Commission does not have any teeth. For instance, the NHRC does not have enough facilities to impartially investigate a case. It is not the manner in which the NHRC deals with a few high profile cases like the Best Bakery case that defines the role of a body like the Commission. What really proves the metal of the NHRC of India is how it deals with the normal day to day incidents that are brought before it. In the Nandigram incident instead of launching its own investigation the NHRC has asked the Government of West Bengal to submit a report. What does the Commission expect from this report? If the Commission expects a true picture of the Nandigram incident from a state report, well then, the Commission is yet to understand why it was constituted.
Regarding the CBI's mandate to investigate the Nandigram incident, the AHRC is really doubtful whether it will be of any use. What can the CBI do as investigation into the incident? For example will anyone in Nandigram speak to the agency about what had really happened? If there is anyone willing to speak could the agency provide protection to the witnesses - at least until the perpetrators are finally prosecuted? And will such a prosecution happen in any near future considering the woeful lack of facilities like those for conducting autopsies in West Bengal? At least regarding the forensic facilities available in West Bengal, the AHRC is certain that the CBI will find real problems since even today hundreds of bodies are rotting in ill-fated mortuaries in West Bengal. In fact the bodies, by the time they are examined by an inexperienced 'Dom' [cleaner employed in mortuaries in West Bengal from the Dom community which is considered as untouchables by caste Hindus in India], only the skeletons remain. How can the CBI conduct a proper investigation of the case with such facilities?
It is the fundamental failure of the justice systems in India, particularly the police, prosecution and the judiciary that has resulted in Nandigram and Bastar. It is for those who have let this evil happen to make sure that it is not repeated. But that requires an acknowledgment that Nandigram and Bastar should not have happened, not a pointless white washing of a rotten system.
AN APPEAL TO HONOURABLE CHAIRMAN N.H.R.C
I am shocked to learn about the massacre of villagers in Nandigram in
I am informed that the police party, Rapid Action Forces and Eastern Rifles attacked two villages of Nandigram; Sonachura and Bhangaberia from two sides and began indiscriminate firing in the early hours of
According to the
I am also informed that about 70 persons with bullet injuries were brought to Nandigram Block Primary Health Centre, while the state government claims only 38 persons were injured in the incident. The injured are therefore not getting proper medical treatment and the death toll may be high due to improper and untimely medical attention. I am also informed that the political party activists attached to the CPI (M) along with the local police has quarantined the area preventing access to media and other activists to the place and also allegedly involved in cleaning up the evidence.
Considering the urgency of the matter, I strongly request your Commission to immediately send a fact finding team to Nandigram to investigate the details of the massacre and the actual number of the casualties before most of the evidence is destroyed by the police and the CPI (M).
I want to draw you attention that no detailed information of the massacre is available at the moment as the cadres of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the ruling party of West Bengal, has blocked all entries to Nandigram with the help of the police forces and do not allow any persons outside to enter the villages.
I am also worried that if the NHRC does not respond to this incident in time, most of the evidence of the massacre would be destroyed by the police and state government. I am informed that the police have been allegedly carrying the dead bodies to unknown places to hide the actual number of the killed and are allegedly burying the bodies in unknown places and has even tried disposing threw some bodies into the adjoining river.
I also request that representatives of civil society to be included into the NHRC fact finding team to ensure the transparency of the fact finding mission. Please take appropriate actions to ensure that the injured victims can receive proper medical treatment.
I look for your immediate intervention into this matter.
Edited , printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ # LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE – 570017 INDIA………cell : 9341820313 home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ , http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ , http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com , contact : email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA